on BMS it was 100% SOC why it not send to inverter via CAN?
we'll see what happens today. Within an hour there should be 100% SOC
JK BMS CAN bus comms now possible for inverters that support Goodwe and Pylontech batteries
- Thread starter uksa007
- Start date
we'll see what happens today. Within an hour there should be 100% SOC
Observations from running a JK-PB2A16S20P closed loop with SI5048 with Pylontech/Goodwe/Deye Canbus.
The JK has two 100% SOC's, one is from its Coulomb Counter where it uses the Amps and V counters to collect info for a calculator. Second is from one cell triggering Vol Cell RCV setting where there is an immediate reset to 100% SOC. Only the second 100% will slow down the charging rate, the JK seems to ignore the first 100% and still calls for charging at the normal rate until the 2nd 100% is reached, then the charging rate is reduced and if the PV is still available regulated to keep at this Voltage.
So maybe your Deye recognises that the first 100% cannot be 100% if the charging is still requested. Trouble is the JK BMS's seem to differ in how they handle depending on hardware and firmware, so it may just my board and firmware that operates in this way. My SI reports both types of 100% SOC as 100% but will allow full charging with first 100% and restrict charging on the second 100% as the battery pack is at 55.2V which is my target Voltage.
The Coulomb counter is inaccurate on my board even after calibrating V and A on the JK board, so glad the SI ignores the first 100% SOC.
The JK has two 100% SOC's, one is from its Coulomb Counter where it uses the Amps and V counters to collect info for a calculator. Second is from one cell triggering Vol Cell RCV setting where there is an immediate reset to 100% SOC. Only the second 100% will slow down the charging rate, the JK seems to ignore the first 100% and still calls for charging at the normal rate until the 2nd 100% is reached, then the charging rate is reduced and if the PV is still available regulated to keep at this Voltage.
So maybe your Deye recognises that the first 100% cannot be 100% if the charging is still requested. Trouble is the JK BMS's seem to differ in how they handle depending on hardware and firmware, so it may just my board and firmware that operates in this way. My SI reports both types of 100% SOC as 100% but will allow full charging with first 100% and restrict charging on the second 100% as the battery pack is at 55.2V which is my target Voltage.
The Coulomb counter is inaccurate on my board even after calibrating V and A on the JK board, so glad the SI ignores the first 100% SOC.
Sleeper85
Sunday handyman
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2022
- Messages
- 443
Because the 100% BMS is not always true and some brand of inverter stops charging at 100%. If you remain stuck at 99%, your battery has not finished charging.
Check this post concerning DEYE TOU : https://diysolarforum.com/threads/deye-weird-voltage-behavior-when-time-of-use-is-enabled.80908/
Check this post concerning DEYE TOU : https://diysolarforum.com/threads/deye-weird-voltage-behavior-when-time-of-use-is-enabled.80908/
Sleeper85
Sunday handyman
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2022
- Messages
- 443
In the case of using an ESP32 JK-BMS-CAN, the ESP32 and our software is the only component that communicates with the inverter. The 100% BMS is completely ignored, 100% is sent only at the end of the full charging process.
Ok, ill let You know when i get 100% SOC - 280ah and 99% SOC on inverter. Yesterday i have 100% on BMS and 99% on inverter cannot end... it
ok i'll check it
Ok im checked but without positive result - BMS SOC 100%, Deye SOC 99%
TOU set like this to try out
dont know what to do absorption offset have
dont know why when i have BMS balancing set to ON
status on BMS is OFF (wylaczono)
but charging status is
and is like this just after getting BULK - 54,2V
if i turn BMS BALANCE switch off this status changes to absorption. But nothing work still have SOC 99% with no end
I was trying with TOU set to OFF, and like You see with 100% on some time - no results still not ending charging
Last edited:
maybe i should change this code somhow?
Code:
canbus.send:
can_id: 0x355
data: !lambda |-
// Byte [00:01] : State of Charge (SOC) (1 %)
// Byte [02:03] : State of Health (SOH) (1 %)
// Byte [04:05] : SOC high resolution (0.01 %)
// Byte [06:07] : Remaining total capacity (1 Ah) (Sofar)
uint8_t can_mesg[8];
uint16_t soc;
uint16_t soh;
// SOC - Sending 100% only at the end of the absorption phase
if (id(state_of_charge).state < 100) soc = id(state_of_charge).state; // SOC < 100% => Sending BMS SOC
else if (id(eoc) == true) soc = 100; // End Of Charge => Sending 100%
else soc = 99;but how could be the end i have now like this
i dont know why charing status is "balancing" instead of "absorption" - this is when i have this option ON
with OFF charging status is "Absorption" now when is 54,5V is "wait" and discharging -10W to 54,2V (why it make 54,5V - 03, more than BULK)
Last edited:
OK now i have 100% SOC on DEYE and EOC status
i have turned OFF balance option on BMS
and Deye discharge from 54,5V to 54,2 and then from "wait" status changed to "EOC" and 100% SOC arrived.... so please tell me how to enable balancing with no issue like this? i cannot use balansing with 2A to get 100% SOC and charging is end?
i have turned OFF balance option on BMS
and Deye discharge from 54,5V to 54,2 and then from "wait" status changed to "EOC" and 100% SOC arrived.... so please tell me how to enable balancing with no issue like this? i cannot use balansing with 2A to get 100% SOC and charging is end?
Sleeper85
Sunday handyman
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2022
- Messages
- 443
esphome-jk-bms-can/documents/README/Cut-Off_Charging_Logic.md at main · Sleeper85/esphome-jk-bms-can
Contribute to Sleeper85/esphome-jk-bms-can development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
You have a large delta cell V.
It is necessary to have the complete list of your parameters to analyze them.
The code has been tested, there is no need to modify it.
esphome-jk-bms-can/documents/README/Cut-Off_Charging_Logic.md at main · Sleeper85/esphome-jk-bms-can
Contribute to Sleeper85/esphome-jk-bms-can development by creating an account on GitHub.
You have a large delta cell V.
It is necessary to have the complete list of your parameters to analyze them.
The code has been tested, there is no need to modify it.
sure diff is large thats why I use BULK 54,2V but why with balance option ON charging dont END with EOC but still charging to 54,5V with small Watts.
Ok so if i have Balance trigger 0,003V and diff is 0,050V my charging status EOC will not appear till diff will be smaller than 0,003V?
ok i'll try use this like 0,01V
can You explain me these settings
should I have these ON or OFF?
and I'd like to thank Your patience
Similar threads
