The significant deviation in the cell voltage lines of the above two images is not encouraging.
+1 this has to be the craziest cell graph that I have come across...Wildly out of balance.
+1 this has to be the craziest cell graph that I have come across...
I would not balance via the BMS but take the pack apart and put all the cells in parallel and charge them up to 3.55.
When you do this make sure the pos. and neg. leg of the charger are on the opposite ends of the pack to ensure the charge 'flows' through the pack effectively. Depending on the charger size it may take a while but make sure you do not over charge the pack.
I believe Will has a good video recapping the process I mentioned above.
Once all the cells are balanced then put them together and make sure the torque settings are similar to avoid a loose connection. From there you should have a good baseline to determine if you have some laggard cells.
to @Alexplose I'm going to say (having read the whole thing at least passingly) what I think you need to do is individually charge each cell and monitor current and take each cell to the 3.65V level and measure the input current (I use a tool like a 150A in line which reports to me the voltage and the amps and other details in summary). Do this for each cell. Then do a discharge test at something like C or half C and again document that. This will (imo)Simple answer, #13 is always lowest v on discharge and always first to reach cutoff when charging… the cell is lowest capacity.
this is a good theory and different BMS's have different capacity for a delta V between cells (especially passive type BMS).It's almost like the cell balancing process that the BMS may be attempting is corrupted. It tries to balance but pushes more volts than it should. Like it's pulling volts out of all the cells but two and sending that voltage to the two cells.
@Alexplose Just be very careful going the last .1 volts. there is very little AH left and you'll reach 3.65 a lot faster than you expect... I know i overcharged a few cells when i first put my pack together.If you "top balanced" your cells to 3.55 you didn't top balance you cells. Fully Top balance to 3.65 you won't hurt the cells if you're doing this properly.
The very first time you got your cells and you said you top balanced the was is 3.65 or 3.55?
Is this top balanced when the voltage accross the pack is 3.654V, and the individual cells are about 3.650-1V, charger is still pushing some amps, I disconnected, will let rest and see the resting voltage.
Yes that's it, so now I need to take them apart and see which one is mis behaving."I disconnected" - assuming you mean disconnected from the charger.
Once you terminate charging, you need to disconnect them from being in parallel. If you leave them in parallel, they will all stay at the same voltage. Disconnecting them will allow you to see any outlier behavior.
Yes that's it, so now I need to take them apart and see which one is mis behaving.
I measured 3.642, 3.643 on all cells how many time before I can see something ?
+1 day but i am not sold it is a cell that is the problem from reviewing your graphs & given a large number of cells are showing wide swings. my bet is a bad bms or bad bms setting or wire / connection issue.Yes that's it, so now I need to take them apart and see which one is mis behaving.
I measured 3.642, 3.643 on all cells how many time before I can see something ?
At this time the deviation is between 3.604 and 3.595, I'll let some more time to make sur, and will recrimp my bms wires