Kenny_
Solar Addict
Nice!
Nice!
Those panels look square? Aren’t most commercially available PV panels rectangular?
The look like nine conventional panels on each tracker in a landscape orientation to me.Those panels look square? Aren’t most commercially available PV panels rectangular?
Are we looking at the same photo?The look like nine conventional panels on each tracker in a landscape orientation to me.
I have a couple Renogy 115W bifacials and they are 30.9"*30":Are we looking at the same photo?
If they’re half cut panels they are three across the top in portrait and one on the bottom in landscape but that leaves a half panel in the lower corner that looks square. If they’re not half cut panels then there are nine, but they would be either nearly or perfectly square. Never seen a truly square panel, even 20 year old 75-100w ones were rectangular.
Perspective. Look at the top right mount. Just 9 panels in landscape, three rows, three columns.Are we looking at the same photo?
If they’re half cut panels they are three across the top in portrait and one on the bottom in landscape but that leaves a half panel in the lower corner that looks square. If they’re not half cut panels then there are nine, but they would be either nearly or perfectly square. Never seen a truly square panel, even 20 year old 75-100w ones were rectangular.
Of virtually square panels? If yes then I agree. My point was square panels are uncommon-compared to standard rectangular ones.Perspective. Look at the top right mount. Just 9 panels in landscape, three rows, three columns.
But they aren’t square. As I said, look at the top right. Regular black rectangular panels in landscape orientation 3x3. The other panels are slimming down laterally due optical perspective.Of virtually square panels? If yes then I agree. My point was square panels are uncommon-compared to standard rectangular ones.
I just don’t see what you’re describing, we must be looking at different picturesBut they aren’t square. As I said, look at the top right. Regular black rectangular panels in landscape orientation 3x3. The other panels are slimming down laterally due optical perspective.
Same way my panels look like this from my mom’s porch:
View attachment 173715
But in reality they are more like this:
View attachment 173716
@SolarRich
It's very hard to convince people not to put sonotubes below ground if you need the stability. So kudos to them for specifically calling that out.They specify not to use sonotubes, the whole is to be drilled or dug using a hoe and filled with concrete. This is due to not wanting to disturb the surrounding soil.
I like the idea of sticking them a bit below ground and then adding clay/top soil (after it’s poured) and tamping the ever living crap out of them to create a bell shaped concrete shape. RR buildings (YouTube) does this on pole buildings.It's very hard to convince people not to put sonotubes below ground if you need the stability. So kudos to them for specifically calling that out.
More detail please?
Look at the mounting rails, all are vertical. Hold downs on rails are above and below each row.I just don’t see what you’re describing, we must be looking at different pictures
View attachment 173838
View attachment 173836View attachment 173837
The bottom one. Using some like Rec or Aptos all black panels. Again the upper right image is the one to look at. The one you are showing is more oblique to the camera.I just don’t see what you’re describing, we must be looking at different pictures
View attachment 173838
View attachment 173836View attachment 173837
400 watt SolariaThe bottom one. Using some like Rec or Aptos all black panels. Again the upper right image is the one to look at. The one you are showing is more oblique to the camera.