Search results

Not to mention they made the fucking germ in the first place.

Science is just a process. We fully accept that. What liberals have done is to try to make the word science mean something like "truth" or "facts". Use either of those two words in place of Science and either will work in the frame they are trying to paint. Since us non-commies understand...

Why do you think energy spent condensing water is wasted? The wasted energy would be in the form of cooling air that ultimately escapes through the drafty gaps in the house you would only need to stop that vs trying to dehumidify the air that shouldn't be getting into the living space in the...

He posted yesterday

You poo poo the person or website before you poo poo the data. And, often, you never poo poo the data. That is how manipulative people work. They come one with emotions first and facts second, and often never.

https://www.thecooldown.com/outdoors/big-bear-lake-drought-photos-nature-power/

Even said he found it "very exciting!"

That's just happenstance. I liked big trucks way before I knew I had a little dick.🤥

Standard Process for the good stuff. 👍 https://www.standardprocess.com

Patriot Power Generator has you covered. Lets you charge cell phone and run TV in event of extended total grid outage.

Aliexpress layout is shit. I absolutely cannot tell what I'm getting and from who. Kudos to anyone who figures it out. I went to buy some cells and then realized it was an obvious ripoff and did a PayPal charge back.

I'm fack'n dead. 😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Which is what's most annoying. Ignoring actual pollutants in favor of creating tyranny.

Well, ok. That's a different argument than saying CO2 has no effect. I'll have to do some research before I can agree/disagree with the above or not. At the end of the day, though, other than internet arguments I just don't care because "fixing" the problem is just as you know, a path to tyranny.

Wait a minute. That's not true. Co2 is definitely associated with greater warming of the atmosphere by virtue of absorbing more of the sun's energy. This is easily verified via simple experiments that can be done at home.

Dingus, to capture carbon, you have to undo the reaction that liberated it in the first place.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Bernstein

One thing that tripped me out was the flickering/waving action of the light. It puts into perspective how fast the solar wind is moving across the earth's atmosphere.

That's what I thought early evening as well. We hiked to the the top of a hill so we could see better. I was wondering why it was dam smokey.

It's an opportunity to stand out. Like Michael Gross did in Tremors.

Forgive me but frying the whole grid? That doesn't seem like a reasonable fear. Some equipment damage, sure. But that can be fixed pretty easily. At no time in history were we more safe than we are now.

She's such a fucking creep. She sounds like the waterboy with her admonishing. "Now remember, those kids can the disease home where they'll get grandma and grandpa sick and they can die"

I'm at 10 cents a kwh. Solar at the home is for kicks only if I were to ever indulge. And frankly just silly given our latitude. It's a necessity at the cabin due to closest power being 1.5 miles away. I spent more on the small cabin system which still needs a backup gen than I spend for 3...

The idea is to get you paying more for energy. Just as they have done with "housing". They can chew up a larger percentage of your income into fixed costs. You either pay the power bill or without heat or necessities.

When do they come into play? Edit: So as the battery comes to full charge, the fets disconnect the main charging path and charging is completed through those coils?

I don't know.

Yeah. We can see you smoke just the right amount of crack before you post on here. Too little and you start making sense, too much and you're a full on commie libtard...just the right amount turns this into a "journey" where get to pretend you're an objective learner, just embracing the...

I know that BMS can communicate with inverters and charge controllers. What you said is the bms itself can control the amount of charging current using its own internal circuitry which implies it does standalone without the need for inverter communications unless what you meant is the inverter...

This is a terrible post. You apparently do not know or understand anything.

I didn't know there were BMS that could throttle current and did so based on state of charge. That's news to me. I didn't realize BMS had the ability to duty cycle the fets and could gradually lower the voltage present at the cell terminals. I always thought "tail current" or whatever setting...

The only way it can drop amps is by dropping the voltage. If battery voltage and charger voltage are equal, no current will flow.

Interesting. Ok So if you have absorb voltage to say 3.5 volts per cell, as the battery approaches fully charged, the charger will lower it's output voltage in order to limit the amps flowing into the battery or the BMS itself begins to throttle the current down by duty-cycling the fets to...

So the charger lowers it output voltage so the amperage drops as the battery nears full? That's a weird feature. I'm still learning or always learning but what purpose does that serve?