diy solar

diy solar

Can Solar & Wind Fix Everything (e.g., Climate Change) with a battery break-through?

Thanks for sharing your thoughts Dingdong.

Can you help me out? Are your Murphytard or Leotard(šŸ¤£)? <ā€ā€ā€(A balet dress)

Why did you get banned?


Last check atheists was pushed by scientists ā€¦.. also known as Darwin. Watching science being drawn by ppl with no religion is funny.
Their replacement religion is worshipping climate studies and fella man kind. Like the false religion of worshipping covid-19 vaccines that didnā€™t work. ā€˜Trust the scienceā€. Snicker. . Their agendas are were about same in aspects.

Most catholics I know do not follow the Pope. Most any religion that embraced homo and transgender are in Biblical violation too. The Pope is gay embraced. Some practicing Rabbi Jews suck baby


IMG_6231.jpeg



Not that many jews are religious. Ppl think all jews are religious - they are not. Some ppl in religion are compromised. Some are money ā€¦ MERCHANTS. If a church condones against bible thenā€¦not a church of God.

Svetz lives in an expensive friggin swampā€¦ and wants to blame something. The Keys use to be SNOBS. RED NECK VERSION OF Marthaā€™s Vineyard. šŸ¤”šŸ¤£ Which btw Obuma and his kind moved to coast ā€¦. too. šŸ¤£ Imagine direct knowledge of dangers but ignoring themā€¦. šŸ¤£šŸ˜³

Our insurance should be separate and no national relief fund should be given They need move the f outta that swamp. We should not have high insurance that pays their impending diaster or more taxes because of their poor choices. It is like the extreme sports where everyone cried because risk taker got killedā€¦ā€¦ I laughed. No reason at all to have risked it. None. B
 

Poll Shows Americanā€™s Still Rank Climate Change as a Low Priority​

CCW-low-poll-results.png

Gallup Inc. is widely recognized as one of the foremost polling and advisory companies. It regularly conducts public policy surveys asking participants, often registered voters, broken down by gender, income levels, political party affiliation or leanings, and education levels, to describe what they feel are the top public policy issues or concerns, often ranking them.

Gallupā€™s surveys have asked about climate change as an issue for decades. While a majority or near majority of participants have pretty consistently ranked climate change as an issue of concern, they have, over the years, consistently ranked it as last or near last among the top issues of concern.

Gallupā€™s annual survey in 2024 polled a random sample of 1,016 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, delivering a sampling error of Ā±4 percentage points.

Gallupā€™s 2024 Earth Day poll is consistent with past surveys. Gallup found that 42 percent of Americans surveyed worry ā€œa great dealā€ about global warming or climate change, with another 20 percent worrying ā€œa fair amount.ā€

Fifty-nine percent of those surveyed believe global warming has already begun to happen, but a majority (55 percent), also do not think it will pose a serious threat in their own lifetime.

When ranked against other issues confronting the nation, as Gallup states: ā€œEnvironmental Worries Lag Behind Economic and Social Issues,ā€ which is also consistent with past surveys. And all of this is despite nearly two decades of climate alarm propagandizing in the mainstream media.

ā€œAmong the leading issues confronting the nation, the environment ranks as a lesser public concern, with 37% saying they worry a great deal about environmental quality,ā€ Gallup reports.

In fact, worry about a quality environment tied for 11th place with ā€œthe availability and affordability of energy,ā€ out of the 14 issues of concern Gallup listed. Only race relations and unemployment at 35 percent and 33 percent, respectively, ranked lower. By contrast, more than 50 percent of those surveyed said that they worry a great deal about inflation, crime and violence, hunger and homelessness, the economy, affordable health care, and government spending. Concern about illegal immigration, drug use, the social security system, and the possibility of a terrorist attack all also ranked above concern about a quality environment.

Of course, climate change is just one environmental challenge lumped together under the category ā€œquality of the environment.ā€ When various environmental issues were polled individually, poll participants said pollution of drinking water; pollution of rivers, lakes, and streams; and contamination of soil and water by toxic waste were each more worrying to them than climate change. And this response comes despite the fact those topics collectively are rarely discussed by politicians, and never as an existential threat to human life, and get a fraction of the coverage climate change does.

Interestingly, Gallup reported in 2023 that concern about various environmental issues, while rising and falling year to year, has declined overall since 2000, when Gallup first started breaking down environmental issues. The number of people saying they are very worried about climate change fell from a high of 46 percent in 2020, and now sits just two points above the level of concern participants displayed when they were first asked about it in the annual poll in 2000.

Sources: Gallup; Gallup
 
Bongbong is leoism Mentions smokes dope to get away from phobias and fears then shown by cdc that smoking dope causes phobias and fearsā€¦..denies science. šŸ¤”šŸ¤£šŸ˜³šŸ‘€šŸ„ø
Typical intrusive foreigner ā€¦ meddling in USA politics ā€¦ā€¦ Globalist agenda.
 
I love it Svetz posting BIll Gates! Thanks for confirming you are a shill Svetz




 
Last check atheists was pushed by scientists ā€¦.. also known as Darwin. Watching science being drawn by ppl with no religion is funny.
Their replacement religion is worshipping climate studies and fella man kind. Like the false religion of worshipping covid-19 vaccines that didnā€™t work. ā€˜Trust the scienceā€. Snicker. . Their agendas are were about same in aspects.

Most catholics I know do not follow the Pope. Most any religion that embraced homo and transgender are in Biblical violation too. The Pope is gay embraced. Some practicing Rabbi Jews suck baby


View attachment 213450



Not that many jews are religious. Ppl think all jews are religious - they are not. Some ppl in religion are compromised. Some are money ā€¦ MERCHANTS. If a church condones against bible thenā€¦not a church of God.

Svetz lives in an expensive friggin swampā€¦ and wants to blame something. The Keys use to be SNOBS. RED NECK VERSION OF Marthaā€™s Vineyard. šŸ¤”šŸ¤£ Which btw Obuma and his kind moved to coast ā€¦. too. šŸ¤£ Imagine direct knowledge of dangers but ignoring themā€¦. šŸ¤£šŸ˜³

Our insurance should be separate and no national relief fund should be given They need move the f outta that swamp. We should not have high insurance that pays their impending diaster or more taxes because of their poor choices. It is like the extreme sports where everyone cried because risk taker got killedā€¦ā€¦ I laughed. No reason at all to have risked it. None. B

Is it just happenstance that the catholic church has hopped on the climate change bandwagon?

The same church that human trafficked little boys so they could phuk them.

There is a strong correlation between pedophilia and "believing" in climate change.

It's almost as if the believers want more money and power to satisfy their socially unacceptable desires and perhaps also to latch onto issues that make them appear virtuous on the surface.
 
it get very convoluted with people.

IMO the reason some people are not on-board with the whole fossil fuels/climate change
plan can be seen in the plots of movies like Fountainhead/Atlas Shrugged , old ideas, but still out there.
Capture477.PNG
She supported rational and ethical egoism as opposed to altruism. In politics, she condemned the initiation of force as immoral and supported laissez-faire capitalism, which she defined as the system based on recognizing individual rights, including private property rights. Although she opposed libertarianism, which she viewed as anarchism.


my interest in progress on these issues are not because of any personal fears now, but I do care for my great, great, grandkids.
so I'll support any effort we can take now to increase their chances in the future.

the only risk I can see, as we continue to pump crap into the air, and by doing that increase the world's temperature
could that mitigate the coming ice age. if with stop treating our atmosphere as a toilet are my great, great, grandkids
going to have to wear a coat all the time :unsure:

Capture478.PNG
 
Last edited:
The govt helping us


it get very convoluted with people.

IMO the reason some people are not on-board with the whole fossil fuels/climate change
plan can be seen in the plots of movies like Fountainhead/Atlas Shrugged , old ideas, but still out there.
View attachment 213494
She supported rational and ethical egoism as opposed to altruism. In politics, she condemned the initiation of force as immoral and supported laissez-faire capitalism, which she defined as the system based on recognizing individual rights, including private property rights. Although she opposed libertarianism, which she viewed as anarchism.


my interest in progress on these issues are not because of any personal fears now, but I do care for my great, great, grandkids.
so I'll support any effort we can take now to increase their chances in the future.
You nor I are not helping if we bury all of them in more debt without positive results.

Spending $5 trillion dollars on covid vaccines - bs was not smart. Made select ppl wealthy like Gates. Rip off.
The same mindset of trust the science is happening.
laissez faire never worked in military but was reimplemented in 2010 by Obuma. Why it is compromised. It is bs.
Same as mountain of debt is called progress but reality is debt enslavement ā€¦ā€¦ we are upside down on GDP vs Owed. No business can continue like that. They are headed to big crash and it was done on purpose.

They want event here so can blame it for the wealth - theft they have done.
 
No business can continue like that.
D71, you astound me with your knowledge on a great many topics, but confuse me when
you conflate government and business, no business I know of prints their own currency.
I get they are connected, but are not the same thing, or should be judged on the same criteria IMO.

the line too big to fail is always true for governments IMO
 
The govt helping us



You nor I are not helping if we bury all of them in more debt without positive results.

Spending $5 trillion dollars on covid vaccines - bs was not smart. Made select ppl wealthy like Gates. Rip off.
The same mindset of trust the science is happening.
laissez faire never worked in military but was reimplemented in 2010 by Obuma. Why it is compromised. It is bs.
Same as mountain of debt is called progress but reality is debt enslavement ā€¦ā€¦ we are upside down on GDP vs Owed. No business can continue like that. They are headed to big crash and it was done on purpose.

They want event here so can blame it for the wealth - theft they have done.

We need energy for modern society to function, obviously.

The idea is turn carbon into a product that large hedge funds can easily buy and sell on paper.

As of now, energy is a tangible product with logistical issues, skilled labor etc that all must be dealt with but huge sums of money are spent on it.
 
my great, great, grandkids going to have to wear a coat all the time
It's a little hard to tell from your graph, but the natural cycle downswings take 1,000s
of years. So it would be a few more generations of Tommy's before coats were needed
from natural climate change in summer. Hopefully your future generations can help
solve some of those problems. No pressure ; -)

... the world's temperature could that mitigate the coming ice age.
The last ice age ended >10,000 years ago. The observed and measured (ice core) data to the right shows that uptick at end which makes me think your right in that we won't have to worry about that even when we hit net zero (at least for hundreds of years.
 

Pritzker Doubles-Down With $827 Million Taxpayer Handout To Troubled EV-Maker Rivian​

At $1.5 million per job, this new incentive package from the state is at least 15 times the norm. For this much money, the state could have just handed out a million bucks to 827 people, instead of creating 550 jobs.

Gov. JB Pritzker announced Thursday that the State of Illinois will provide an $827 million incentive package for Rivian to invest $1.5 billion to expand its electric vehicle factory in Normal, Illinois. The expansion is expected to create at least 550 full-time jobs within the next five years, and will build Rivianā€™s next model EV, the R2. Rivian initially got $49.5 million under Gov. Bruce Rauner in 2017 to create 1,000 jobs at the same location.

The new deal gives $1.5 million per job created, which is astronomical in the world of location incentives. Estimated average location incentives paid by state and local governments around the nation range from $13,000 to $84,000 per job, though sometimes go as high as $100,000 per job for capital intensive projects. Even using that high end, Rivianā€™s package will be 15 times whatā€™s typical.

Moreover, Rivian is on shaky wheels, along with the rest of the U.S. EV industry. Rivian loses over $43,000 for every vehicle it sells and has had two rounds of layoffs this year. The decision to move its R2 production to Illinois is a further reflection of the companyā€™s need to preserve cash. R2 production was initially planned for a new $5 billion plant in Georgia, heavily subsidized by the state. But Rivian concluded that moving production to the existing Illinois facility would save cash.

Its stock price has consequently been hammered. It reached a high of $172 per share in 2021 but now trades at less than $10 per share.



Rivian is not alone. As a CNBC headline recently declared, ā€œEV euphoria is dead. Automakers are scaling back or delaying their electric vehicle plans.ā€ Since then, the news is no better. Ford announced last week that it is losing a stunning $132,000 per vehicle. Hertz announced last week a second round of sales of its EV fleet due to heavy maintenance and depreciation costs. For the first quarter of this year, EV sales continued to slow and the share of EV sales for all autos actually decreased. While total EV sales are still up a bit from last year, the growth rate is not nearly enough to put EV makers on a path to profitability.

EV makers pin their hopes on less expensive models that they promise soon, and on more public charging stations, into which Illinois last month announced it would invest an additional $50 million. Rivian hopes its new R2 will be among the new, lower priced models. However, its starting price is expected to be about $45,000 and it wonā€™t come out until the first half of 2026.

Regarding the astronomical incentive package to be paid by Illinois, in fairness, it should be noted that most of it is in the form of tax credits to be granted over the next 30 years. They are available on condition that the company retain 6,000 already existing jobs. However, the fact remains that just 550 new jobs are to be created, and incentive packages like this are not supposed to be payoffs for merely standing still. And a less charitable way to look at it would be that future taxpayers will be on the hook for the high cost of the incentive package ā€” if it works.

Aside from thinking that the incentive package is too low, my first instinct was to ask, ā€œWhereā€™s the warrant coverage.ā€ That is, I know from working as a lawyer and then as an investor, often with troubled companies, that itā€™s not unusual to make risky bets. However, itā€™s routine for the investor to get part of the upside if the venture succeeds, usually in the form of stock or warrants (basically, options) on stock that pay off nicely if things turn around. The federal government, for example, got stock and warrants as part of the deal for its 2010 bailout of the auto industry.

This new Rivian deal has nothing like that. Since the job creation per dollar is minimal, itā€™s just not worth the price.
 

Climate Ideology Ignores Science, Threatens Humanity​

Climate scientists would be less likely to issue dire warnings of planetary doom if they gave more credence to the geological history of the past several million years. Instead, they rely on computer models that are biased by the preconceptions of their manipulators and incapable of accounting for the myriad factors influencing global temperatures.

Minuscule recent warming, whatever the cause, is inconsequential in light of the long record of data found in Antarctica ice cores that go back 800,000 years. The bottom line is that Earth is colder by nearly 3 degrees Celsius than it was 3,000 years ago and is just now climbing out of its longest cold spell of the last 10,000 years. Blaring headlines about record heat waves of the past 100 years are meaningless, hysterical blather.

A deeper dive into geologic history ā€” based partly on the record stored over millions of years in deep-ocean sediments ā€” shows that todayā€™s carbon dioxide concentrations of 420 parts per million are a fraction of past levels that reached 5,000 ppm and more. Carbon dioxide is nearly at its lowest level ever since plant life began so many millions of years ago and well below the optimum amount for the health of most vegetation.

In fact, the 280-ppm concentration of the mid-19th century is uncomfortably close to the point at which plant life dies ā€” below 150 ppm. Given that all life depends on adequate amounts of this gas, proposals to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide are nothing less than reckless.

Any global increase in carbon dioxide will be beneficial and have nearly no impact on future temperature. In contrast, demonstrated in the ā€œbibleā€ of human history and climate change compiled by the late professor Hubert Lamb at the University of East Anglia, cold kills.


During the Little Ice Age in parts of England, the ā€œyearly number of burials exceeded the births from the 1660ā€™s until about 1730,ā€ he reported.

Why, then, are so many demonizing fossil fuels? The wealth enabled by coal, oil and natural gas has provided the leisure ā€” and funding ā€” for numerous researchers to focus on climate change instead of struggling to stay alive. Global society is absolutely dependent upon cheap and plentiful energy for its survival. Why would some demand that civilization retreat from useful energy sources to bring back mass starvation, poverty and horse-drawn buggies?

To dream of a utopian world is perhaps admirable, but to inflict suffering upon society through ignorance of science is deplorable.

Humanity is deprived of precious learning when so many favor the ideology and fearmongering of climate alarmists over the meticulous research of eminent physical scientists such as Richard Alley, professor of geoscience at Pennsylvania State University, who pioneered studies of ice cores, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who explored the incredible complexity of atmospheric physics.

We could easily name dozens of others similarly credentialed, who are largely unknown outside the scientific community.

The public is ā€œprotectedā€ from empirical data by legacy and social media censors who eagerly broadcast the supposed need to restrict global warming to 1.5 or 2.0 degrees Celsius ā€” artificial constructs with no scientific basis.

We thus suffer the consequences of unwarranted regulatory intrusions into daily life, be they restrictions on heating, air conditioning, dishwashers and stoves or the increased price and reduced availability of electricity. The effects of these range from annoying to life-threatening.

There is no global climate emergency. There is, however, a widespread knowledge crisis.

This commentary was first published at The Washington Times on May 1, 2024.
 
Bruh, this has to be fake..nobody is this fucking stupid.

Oh wait....climate change enthusiasts
You know someone will always say hold my beerā€¦.take that as a challengeā€¦. šŸ¤”šŸ¤£

There was development proposals for tidal wave generators but guess they got canned. Think it was in popular science or popular mechanics a long time ago.
 
Back
Top