diy solar

diy solar

Rant: EG4 48v 100ah battery has faulty BMS. Signature solar customer service is TERRIBLE

You having Signature Solar update the Spec sheet from saying 250A for 1 second to what?
How does this help the guy after he is out $700?

If it did fail to meet spec sheet, that's a reason to refund customer 100% including shipping.
Then update the spec sheet (and highlight the change on website so anyone who previously downloaded while contemplating purchase is alerted before ordering.)
 
I wish I could buy the system Will just put together:

Maybe if I win the lottery soon, I will place an order.
@Will Prowse keeps saying this inverter is UL listed. I am a member of the UL database and it is not listed.
Only the EG4 Lifepower4 batteries are listed. You will not be able to get this combination to pass inspection and I have no idea why Will keeps saying it will.
 
Last edited:
You having Signature Solar update the Spec sheet after the guy is out $700 is not going to help him.
I think you know by now that I'm a huge customer advocate. I'm pretty sure I've made that really clear on the forums in general. I read all the email interactions with this customer. The short circuit timeframe doesn't change the fact that without any load at all his inverter by itself has specifications that exceed those listed by the battery. I like to think I am a very fair headed person and make fair decisions for everyone. I'll be speaking with the team and seeing if we can additionally refund a larger portion of the restocking fee - but I really hate to deviate from Signature Solar's published guidelines as it incentivizes people who received the same information and treatment as everyone else to think that they deserve special treatment and exceptions, but those who play by the rules and read the documentation are punished because they don't. I will be researching this further to see if there are any other extenuating circumstances.
 
If it did fail to meet spec sheet, that's a reason to refund customer 100% including shipping.
Then update the spec sheet (and highlight the change on website so anyone who previously downloaded while contemplating purchase is alerted before ordering.)
It's funny actually, testing exceeded our newest spec sheet (and the one posted) but I'm sure for liability reasons they updated the spec sheet to reduce or extend specific parameters. So, essentially, the battery returned actually would hold up to either.
 
They do 220V 50Hz Single Phase so I don't see how they are useless.
they are useless, because when i order a Deye 12k, i do so for 2300 euro for the Deye and 2700 for the sunsynk.
i would pay 7300 usd for the same machine with a sol-ark sticker on it.
the difference is enough to buy me 32 or possibly more grade a lifepo4 cells and a good bms if i would choose to do so.

hence.. it is useless
 
... the fact that without any load at all his inverter by itself has specifications that exceed those listed by the battery.

Are you saying that the no-load current draw of his inverter exceeds the maximum continuous current of the battery you sell??

Does it exceed what the published data sheet for the battery (at the time) said battery could put out?


I understand inverter under full load might exceed battery capability. But that is different from inverter powering a < 1kW appliance.
 
If it did fail to meet spec sheet, that's a reason to refund customer 100% including shipping.
Then update the spec sheet (and highlight the change on website so anyone who previously downloaded while contemplating purchase is alerted before ordering.)
Exactly. I am in another thread right now where James from SS who is boasting that the the LV6548 Errr, I mean 6500 is an Automatic UPS with 20ms transfer times. When I pointed out that 20ms is not transfer time for a UPS and that 5ms and under is considered a UPS time and maybe a few items can get away with 10ms but not 20ms as that will Glitch everything in your house, he quickly had one of his people state that it's actually 10ms not 20ms. I am sure the manual for there 6548 is being redone as we speak.
All I am saying is that if you buy something from Signature Solar you better download all the documentation before you order it and always save it.
 
Last edited:
@Will Prowse keeps saying this inverter is UL listed. I am a member of the UL database and it is not listed.
Only the EG4 Lifepower4 batteries are listed.
As far as regulatory approval goes, there isn't a difference between ETL, TUV, and UL listings. Inspectors treat them equally as they are all approved by the US Government as NRTLs. The inverter has TUV certification.
 
Exactly. I am in another thread right now where James from SS who is boasting that the the LV6548 Errr, I mean 6500 is an Automatic UPS with 20ms transfer times. When I pointed out that 20ms is not transfer time for a UPS and that 5ms and under is considered a UPS time and maybe some systems can get away with 10ms but not 20ms as that will Glitch everything in your house, he quickly had one of his people state that it's actually 10ms not 20ms. I am sure the manual for there 6548 is being redone as we speak.
All I am saying is that if you buy something from Signature Solar you better download all the documentation before you order it and always save it.
I have a printed manual on my desk from about a week ago - it has 20ms for APL setting, 10ms for UPS.
 
As far as regulatory approval goes, there isn't a difference between ETL, TUV, and UL listings. Inspectors treat them equally as they are all approved by the US Government as NRTLs. The inverter has TUV certification.
As Will states in the Video "Everything you see on this wall is UL Listed or Compliant" The problem is the inverter is not UL listed, it is just UL compliant and that is going to be an issue with any inspection.
 
As far as regulatory approval goes, there isn't a difference between ETL, TUV, and UL listings. Inspectors treat them equally as they are all approved by the US Government as NRTLs. The inverter has TUV certification.
It's kind of funny you say that because the MPP LV6548 has been TUV certified for a long time and everybody has stated that you cannot get it Grid certified because it is not UL listed. People including Will Prowse.



Now all of a sudden because SS is selling it, that same certification will work. Can we get a pledge from Signature Solar that if it cannot be certified that they will refund all the customer who bought it based on that claim will get back their money.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
LV6548_Compliant.jpg
 
As Will states in the Video "Everything you see on this wall is UL Listed or Compliant" The problem is the inverter is not UL listed, it is just UL compliant and that is going to be an issue with any inspection.
It is UL Compliant though. Which is what he said. We aren't trying to mislead anyone - we posted our certification documents at the same time we had Signature Solar release the inverter for sale.
Can we get a pledge from Signature Solar that if it cannot be certified that they will refund all the customer who bought it based on that claim will get back their money.
The broad answer is no - Signature Solar researches every RMA and refund request, so I'm sure there will be cases where a refund is appropriate. Really, anyone attempting to pass an inspection should always have their system designed and submitted for approval before making purchases. If you are buying all your equipment first in these cases, you are going about the entire process the wrong way.
 
It is UL Compliant though. Which is what he said. We aren't trying to mislead anyone - we posted our certification documents at the same time we had Signature Solar release the inverter for sale.

The broad answer is no - Signature Solar researches every RMA and refund request, so I'm sure there will be cases where a refund is appropriate. Really, anyone attempting to pass an inspection should always have their system designed and submitted for approval before making purchases. If you are buying all your equipment first in these cases, you are going about the entire process the wrong way.
In the first video on the Inverter itself Will stated the Inverter was UL Listed and would pass inspection.
He said this because this was the information you guys told him. Since myself and Ian pointed out that the Inverter is not listed but is in fact using the same TUV certification that the LV6548 uses he has done his own research and has since edited the second video to remove all recommendations for using it Grid Tied. I suspect he has already edited or is in the process of editing the first video to remove the "Listed" and Grid tied comments also.

You know Richard you say one thing but you know the reality is another.
For instance you know the vast majority of people are going to buy this Inverter before they submit documentation and get approval. James is banking on that. That is why you hear things like limited stock and they are "selling out fast". Lastly when you say RMA and refunds are we talking about the same 30% restocking fee plus the person pays the shipping fee's? I do not think that is right considering this was hyped as being a Grid Tied Inverter that could pass inspection. When we clearly know it has no more chance of passing inspection than an MPP LV6548. Which translates to practically a zero chance of passing.
 
Grid Tied.
I wish the solar industry would decide what this means - the unit isn't 'grid tied' in the sense it will sell back to the grid (I only point this out because that's what a lot of people take 'grid tied' to mean).
would pass inspection
When we clearly know it has no more chance of passing inspection than an MPP LV6548.
We made several changes to the design of the unit that were typically the reasons that the MPP didn't pass inspection - being UL Listed is not a requirement in most jurisdictions, just the requirement that a National Recognized Testing Laboratories (NRTL) has tested the unit to certain specifications. In most cases, TUV, UL, and CSA are all acceptable and recognized. Of course there are certain jurisdictions that require one or the other, but it's rarely a requirement itself.
Lastly when you say RMA and refunds are we talking about the same 30% restocking fee plus the person pays the shipping fee's?
The restocking fee and shipping are always on a case by case basis. I can tell you that in 95% or more RMA/refund requests, Signature Solar does not assess these charges. They are pretty clear about this on their website and during the process.
For instance you know the vast majority of people are going to buy this Inverter before they submit documentation and get approval.
I'll be the first to say it, we 100% recommend people get approval first if this is a requirement. It has never been the stance of EG4 or Signature Solar to simply buy our stuff and hope it passes. In fact, it hurts us more often than not - as I said before we rarely charge restocking fees and shipping, so that's out of pocket for us. But in the end, we can't stop adults from making decisions - there are people who drive cars without licenses etc so we can only give as much information as we can and hope people make the right choices with that information.

Also this is taken from CEC, which I'm sure most here know have some of the strictest guidelines for use. They don't specifically require UL - but here's a screenshot taken from their inverter requirements page. If you have something that states otherwise, I'd also love to see that.
1653680531396.png
Found in the document from their most recent regulations on this page: https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/solar-equipment-lists
 
Last edited:
I have an EasyStart 368 soft starter on my 4 ton HVAC and my 7kw generator can't start it. That got me looking into a secondary source of backup power like a LF inverter and battery solution but I just decided today to get a portable inverter air conditioner from Costco and if we lose power, my generator should be able to handle that no problem. I may still get a battery backup system, but it's lower down on my priority list now.
I'm currently running my AC with easystart 368 it is a 3.5 ton unit. It is pumping along with no problem utilizing a single 5000es-us from signature solar it hits 70% on Startup and just back down to 50% steady. At night I utilize two of the EG4 48v 100ah batteries. I'm surprised your 7K generator cannot start it. Are you sure it is wired correctly?
 

Attachments

  • 20220527_171045_HDR.jpg
    20220527_171045_HDR.jpg
    61.6 KB · Views: 9
  • 20220527_171058_HDR.jpg
    20220527_171058_HDR.jpg
    82.5 KB · Views: 9
This thread is increasingly nasty and mean spirited, not what I’m used to seeing on the forum over the years.

No wonder very few companies are on here.

☹️
LOL No!!
There are very few companies here because of the new rules. Have you read the New Rules? They are posted at the top of the forum.
This is not a sellers forum, this is a place for people to ask questions and get help.
 
This thread is increasingly nasty and mean spirited, not what I’m used to seeing on the forum over the years.

No wonder very few companies are on here.

☹️
Amazon has ruined the world! Everything has free shipping free returns. With this they have created a monster of self-righteous customers that take no responsibility for their self.
I'm not saying signature solar is a saint but they are a great business. I'm not seeing any other companies on here conversing with customers in an open atmosphere.
At the end of the day they are a business and have policies that they need to stick to and Hoops they have to jump through on the way to keep the customer happy.
The only thing that I obtained from this post is that I am putting my robotic vacuum with a battery back to work. Nothing good comes from vacuuming let the robots do it.
 
There are very few companies here because of the new rules. Have you read the New Rules? They are posted at the top of the forum.
This is not a sellers forum, this is a place for people to ask questions and get help.

I have read the new rules and am aware this is not a sellers forum. Never has been. That’s not my concern or the issue I am trying to bring up. I couldn’t care less about sales.

You have missed my point that companies are less likely to help here when people treat them so poorly while they are trying to help.

A bit of civility will often help people help others. If they are just getting a load of grief why bother trying?

And in fact the overwhelming majority of companies whose products we buy don’t make the effort to get on the forum at all.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top