I'm also an engineer, one year out from retirement. I'm also a data guy. Same company for 31 years, 80k employees.
Your primary issue is that you haven't broken through the layer of global censorship yet. Once you do, you will find that the people pulling the strings have more control than you would like to believe. The WEF and their corporate members literally control every media and tech platform on the planet. This is why they can get away with their propaganda and "take down" of almost every dissenting voice, no matter their expertise. As Bret Weinstein would say, "zero is a special number". There was literally no avenue for opposing viewpoints to pervade the public awareness, giving the appearance that there was little dissent. It allows people like you to feel confident in your position, but that confidence is built on a preponderance of propaganda and lies from your trusted "experts". This is why you automatically default to using the word "conspiracy". Anything that challenges the "mainstream consensus" is labeled "right wing conspiracy".
That doesn't make any sense considering you're right here on this forum doing exactly what you're claiming isn't allowed.
And there are tens of thousands of other similar forums across the internet..
Some countries do censor their citizens, the USA is not among them.
Basically what you're arguing is the following: "My unqualified opinion, and the opinions of others, are not allowed to be published on someone else's property."
That's really what this comes down to. You want to be free to push your opinions upon others and do it upon property owned by others. That's not how it works.
Social media platforms, main stream media (whatever crap that means), and other resources, are owned by different entities, and you have no right to publish whatever you want on those platforms. If you want to call it censorship, that's fine because that's exactly what it is. If you come to my home, I will kick you out if you start blabbering nonsense.. Its my property, my rules. If you don't like those rules, you are welcome to open up your own social media platform or purchase property and set your own rules.
Unfortunately for you, I think you will find that the only people who will come to your platform are the demographic proportion of our society that isn't quite rational and playing with a full deck of cards.... and there are a lot of them, so maybe that's enough? Good luck with that.
Now that Twitter is allowing open debate and discussion, that number is greater than zero, so the information is getting through to people who are open to other narratives.
Twitter is not a source of information. Any forum or media resource that allows anyone to say anything they want, is not a source of information.
Since you haven't been exposed to other experts speaking truth and providing supporting data and evidence, you believe there is no other valid position.
I am intelligent enough to know that I am not remotely qualified to speak, understand, or comprehend, the type of science information that is relevant to managing a pandemic. Thus, with that in mind, I am not capable of separating viral, immunological, or other similar scientific information into fact or bullshit.
And to think I could be, would be irrational. And that's the key word.. Irrational.
Have you watched hours of testimony from Dr. McCullough in front of senate panel committees? Have your read his 200 page CV attached to various lawsuits against our health authorities? Do you even conceive of the possibility that the pharmaceutical industry can use their money and power to capture regulatory bodies and fund studies to make sure they get the result they want? Have you watched testimony of these officials and read their emails admitting their part in the corruption? I have. The information is out there if you decide you'd like to entertain data that may be antithetical to your core beliefs. Looking at this data and considering possible motivating factors like profit/greed doesn't make someone mentally ill.
I'll give you but one example of Dr. Tess Laurie referencing her exchange with Andrew Hill and his admission to altering study data related to early treatment of COVID and it's impact on the WHO decision making:
Watch the new short film by Oracle Films, Dr. Tess Lawrie recites a letter to Dr. Andrew Hill and asks him what made him turn his back on a potential cure for
worldcouncilforhealth.org
Always follow the money, and you will usually find the motive. Most systems we rely on have been corrupted by greed to some extent. To not even entertain this possibility means that you will remain ignorant to the pervasiveness of that corruption. It's not rocket science...it simply takes the will to step outside your box.
I'm sure there is corruption.. we live in nation of capitalism and greed rules. Why is that a surprise to you?
Here's what I know.. Once again.. A pandemic hit, we scienced the shit out of it, the pandemic is over.
Once again, which of these do you subscribe to?
Christianity (or any religion)
911 Inside Job
Global Warming fake
Covid consipracy
Moon landings fake
Bigfoot real
Government covering up Aliens
Jewish Space Lasers
Election was Stolen
Conspiracy mentalities usually come in clusters... Please answer the question.