sunshine_eggo
Happy Breffast!
I'm unclear why Andy moves protection back to 3.65V after he sets the "full charge" to be equal to 3.451V.
>3.65V is where LFP can be damaged in terms of reduced cycle life. This is where you want protection.
If 3.451V is 100% full, isn't that where you want to stop charging?
Yes, but you do that with the equipment, not the BMS.
To charge conservatively don't you want to keep protection kicking in around 3.45V? Or 3.55V?
You NEVER use the BMS for routine cut-offs. You set the BMS to the meaningful protection levels (3.65V/2.5V) and set your hardware to operate INSIDE those limits.
I thought pushing the cells to 3.65V regularly wasn't so good for their longevity.
Most cell manufacturers give a 2.5V-3.65V range (with 0.05C tail current). If you operate according to the datasheet specifications, you will get quoted cycle life (on average). If you use the batteries less aggressively, it is generally accepted that you will experience improved cycle life.
Don't overthink it. Typical settings:
BMS protection at 3.65/2.5V
Fast charge to 3.55-3.65V with 15-30 minute absorption and/or 0.05C tail current - useful for generator charging, and you want to actually have 0 absorption if you can with generator unless you NEED true 100%.
Slow charge to 3.45V with one to two hours of absorption - may experience improved cycle life.
Worth noting that many "dumb" BMS have protection values at 3.75V. The server rack type batteries initially were about 3.9V.
LFP can safely be charged to 4.20V, but you get very very little capacity above 3.65V, and you definitely reduce cycle life.
These cells aren't tender snowflakes that will melt if you look at them funny. They are pretty rugged and will perform well if not abused.