I am NOT interested in a grid-tie system but simply want to reduce my grid consumption by eliminating EV charger and electric dryer from my main service panel.
Here's my plan:
(8) 415w panels feeding (2) LV6548s feeding a ~30kwh battery bank (we are putting an addition on our house and so I will have room in the future to add more panels if desired)
All of this will feed an AC Load Center from/to which I will run service to my EV Charger and dryer receptacle.
Those are large loads, more difficult to power than most other loads, but could offer significant savings.
How often do you run laundry? A battery bank to be charged all week so you can run dryer once is not going to be cost effective. Used daily it would be.
EV charger makes sense if utility rate to charge at night is high. I think a PV/battery system which provides 100% or less of daily usage can cost $0.10/kWh amortized over 20 years, $0.20/kWh over 10, $0.40/5 (maybe about 5 year break even depending on rates.)
The key would be to have an automatic transfer switch, or grid fed battery charger, so after draining your ~30kWh bank to charge the EV, you finish charging from grid. You can oversize PV and battery to fully charge EV most of the time, but then you are paying for excess capacity which raises cost per kWh. Trade-off between how much wasted capacity vs. how much bought from grid at a higher price.
With a bit more regulatory hassle, how about a zero export GT PV system, and an AC coupled battery configured to avoid export from PV by charging with surplus, avoid import from grid by discharging. This would supply any and all loads in the house, not be dedicated to laundry and EV.
That sort of system is "peak shaving" and runs in parallel with utility. I'm testing out Sunny Boy Storage with LG RESU-10H, which implements this function (together with communicating with Sunny Boy GT PV inverter).
I think any hybrid that uses CT at grid connection would do this. Consider SolArk, EG4, Sunny Boy Smart Energy.
Utility permission to operate in parallel required, but maybe not net metering.