Exactly: Not wrong. Also not useful.
Sick it on this thread and ask how to properly wire a growatt single phase inverter for split phase...
I’ve used internal tools for corporate “sharepoint” style data that do a good job.Exactly: Not wrong. Also not useful.
Have you tried using the tools? There are some applications that people are pretty happy with like foreign language learning.Think back to the Dot.com bubble, the future potential of the Internet was being sold based on a gigabyte capable network but 56k was the consumer connection. AI has similar potential but it's running at 56k currently.
Absolutely correct.Also, I bet if I didn’t use the shamed name of the technology and called it an auto-summarizer you would have a more neutral reaction.
ChatGPT is a LLM - large language model. Essentially, it knows how language works and what typically follows what. You can view it as a fuzzy compressed blurred view of the written internet. So it's fine at answering common questions. It's poor at technical/legal/detail things. So for many of the general threads here, it'd be fine, but for technical details it's as likely to make up the details as know them.
It's not 'intelligent' and doesn't have any special insights into stuff. View it like a well-spoken nice-but-dim friend - talks well, but knows little, and when pressed for details is likely to stumble.....
Speaking as an AI researcher....
This is the part that scares me. If you are a better programmer than it is, you'll catch the errors (but you don't need it). If you are not as good a programmer, there will be no errors or bugs (that you know of).For writing code it does pretty well once you learn to talk to it and if you guide it through the logic you want.
This is the part that scares me. If you are a better programmer than it is, you'll catch the errors (but you don't need it). If you are not as good a programmer, there will be no errors or bugs (that you know of).
I really need to train myself to use those auto coding platforms as a coding speed up.It has a loooong way to go before it can replace good coders sucessfully. But, it can shorten the time it takes me to write code by at least a factor of 10 including ghe debugging time. And the resulting code is more clear and readable with more error checking.
I’m aware of that, I’m supporting some teams scaling their text context fetching stage of the pipeline.It's not 'intelligent' and doesn't have any special insights into stuff. View it like a well-spoken nice-but-dim friend - talks well, but knows little, and when pressed for details is likely to stumble.....
Speaking as an AI researcher....
I really need to train myself to use those auto coding platforms as a coding speed up.
And this is also why I want to learn how to use the equivalent tools for writing chores in engineering.
I think we should give the LLM a pat on the head for being so good at pretending to do math.
Do they not apply generative rules that are aware of at least the language syntax?I give it a lollipop everytime it spits out correct code.
The answer it gave sounded like a female politician on speed.Exactly: Not wrong. Also not useful.