diy solar

diy solar

Can Solar & Wind Fix Everything (e.g., Climate Change) with a battery break-through?

Not a hurricane...​

As you can imagine from where I live I check the satellite imagery every
morning of the Atlantic. So far this year there's been one storm with
category one winds, but it wasn't classified as a hurricane for whatever
reason (probably not sustained long enough, locals call it no-name).

But that's not what this post is about! The image to the right shows
a huge well formed depression over the Atlantic. Those are great
because as I understand it, they move heat up into the upper atmosphere.
1714387730325.png
This morning's Atlantic satellite imagery​
What's interesting is there's been something like that nearly everyday in the Atlantic since February. If anyone has seen a paper on how much heat they move please post it.
 
Nixon’s White House was far ahead of its time on climate research.
G7 ministers gather in Italy for 'strategic' talks on climate change
Cost of Climate Change
DOE calls for more hydrogen
Turquoise Hydrogen
Clean hydrogen made from fossil fuels, Turquoise hydrogen isn’t just affordable – it’s a bargain to produce... [with carbon credits], once natural gas costs and pyrolysis costs are factored in, the production cost of turquoise hydrogen can be negative in many parts of the country.
Opinion: are you conspiracy theorists seeing a pattern? Not like pyrolysis is new.

 

CNN: $132,000 Loss on Every Sale of an Electric Ford Vehicle​

First published JoNova; Ford CEO Jim Farley still plans to push forward with his loss making electric vehicle strategy.

Ford just reported a massive loss on every electric vehicle it sold
By Chris Isidore, CNN
Updated 2:10 PM EDT, Thu April 25, 2024
New YorkCNN —
Ford’s electric vehicle unit reported that losses soared in the first quarter to $1.3 billion, or $132,000 for each of the 10,000 vehicles it sold in the first three months of the year, helping to drag down earnings for the company overall.
Ford, like most automakers, has announced plans to shift from traditional gas-powered vehicles to EVs in coming years. But it is the only traditional automaker to break out results of its retail EV sales. And the results it reported Wednesday show another sign of the profit pressures on the EV business at Ford and other automakers.
The EV unit, which Ford calls Model e, sold 10,000 vehicles in the quarter, down 20% from the number it sold a year earlier. And its revenue plunged 84% to about $100 million, which Ford attributed mostly to price cuts for EVs across the industry. That resulted in the $1.3 billion loss before interest and taxes (EBIT), and the massive per-vehicle loss in the Model e unit.
The losses go far beyond the cost of building and selling those 10,000 cars, according to Ford. Instead the losses include hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.
And that means this is not the end of the losses in the unit – Ford said it expects Model e will have EBIT losses of $5 billion for the full year.

Despite the EV losses, Ford CEO Jim Farley said in a call with investors the company is making changes in its EV business, and that the company’s planned next generation of EVs will allow it to be profitable on that business in the near future.

Read more: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/24/business/ford-earnings-ev-losses/index.html
What can I say? If you find yourself in a hole, you should stop digging.

Not many people know that Henry Ford and Thomas Edison were good friends, and together tried to develop an electric automobile.

Henry Ford and the electric car
Daniel Strohl
05/25/2010
photo from the collections of The Henry Ford
That Henry Ford and Thomas Edison became good friends later in their lives is well known. …
That Edison and Ford later put their minds together to conceive a low-priced electric car is not so well known.

… In early 1914, word had gotten around that work had started on a low-priced electric car. … Ford himself even confirmed the rumors in the January 11, 1914, issue of the New York Times:
Within a year, I hope, we shall begin the manufacture of an electric automobile. I don’t like to talk about things which are a year ahead, but I am willing to tell you something of my plans.The fact is that Mr. Edison and I have been working for some years on an electric automobile which would be cheap and practicable. Cars have been built for experimental purposes, and we are satisfied now that the way is clear to success. The problem so far has been to build a storage battery of light weight which would operate for long distances without recharging. Mr. Edison has been experimenting with such a battery for some time.
… we know for a fact that at least one experimental Ford electric was built in 1913, …

… the downfall of the Edison-Ford electric car came about because Ford demanded the use of Edison’s nickel-iron batteries in the car, and would have no other battery powering this car. Edison’s batteries, however, were found to have very high internal resistance and were thus incapable of powering an electric car under many circumstances. Heavier lead-acid batteries (which would have made the car too ponderous) were substituted behind Henry Ford’s back, and when he found out, he went ballistic. The program quickly fell to the wayside with other projects demanding Henry Ford’s time. According to The Ford Century, Ford invested $1.5 million in the electric car project and nearly bought 100,000 batteries from Edison before the project fell apart.

Read more: https://www.hemmings.com/stories/2010/05/25/henry-ford-and-the-electric-car
Perhaps Ford CEO Jim Farley imagines himself as Ford’s successor, paying homage to the great man who founded his company by trying to make Ford’s original dream of a commercially successful electric vehicle a reality.

If this is the case, Farley should also maybe consider the other lesson Ford’s EV experience provided, that after burning $1.5 million on the project (in 1914!), Henry Ford finally woke up and realised it was time to pull the plug.
 

Hertz Increases The Number Of Electric Cars It Wants To Get Rid Off To 30,000 From 20,000​

Hertz raised the number of electric vehicles it plans to sell this year as it is cutting its EV fleet to reduce losses that have weighed on the car rental giant’s earnings.


In the first quarter, Hertz upsized its EV disposition plan by 10,000 vehicles, for a total of 30,000 EVs intended for sale in 2024. Most of these EVs will be Teslas.

The company incurred a $195 million charge to vehicle depreciation to write down the EVs held for sale which were remaining in inventory at quarter-end to fair value and recognize the disposition losses on EVs sold in the period, Hertz said in a statement on Thursday

Vehicle depreciation in the first quarter of 2024 increased by $588 million, or $339 on a per unit basis. Of the $339 per unit increase, $119 was related to EVs held for sale, the company said. [if !supportLineBreakNewLine] [endif]

Hertz reported a much larger loss for the first quarter than analysts had forecast. Adjusted net loss stood at $392 million, or $1.28 loss per diluted share.

This compares with an analyst consensus estimate of a loss of $0.45 per share.

Following the earnings release on Thursday, Hertz’s stock crashed by 21% on the NASDAQ but ended off the lows, still down 19%...



Hertz was an early mover in buying EVs to rent to customers, but it and other car rental companies have recently started to sell the EVs they had previously purchased due to weaker customer demand for EV rentals.

Hertz, unlike other rental firms, has a more risky approach because it fully owns all the EVs it has bought and is losing money if the resale value slumps.

As it did.

Earlier this year, Hertz said in a regulatory filing to the SEC it is selling roughly one-third of its electric vehicle fleet, highlighting the risk of its first-mover strategy when it comes to EVs.
 

The Electric Bus Debacle in Antelope Valley: A Case Study in Premature Policy Implementation​


The sudden suspension of electric battery bus services in Antelope Valley two weeks ago has unveiled significant challenges and pitfalls associated with the rush towards electrification of public transit systems, without adequately addressing reliability and infrastructure issues.

image-145.png

This event has left hundreds of commuters stranded, highlighting the essential gaps in planning and risk management that are too often overlooked in the fervor to adopt green technologies.

The Incident
On a seemingly ordinary Tuesday, the Antelope Valley Transit Authority (AVTA) halted all operations involving their fleet of MCI D45 battery-electric commuter coaches. This decision, made “out of an abundance of caution and for reasons outside of AVTA’s control,” abruptly affected the daily routines of countless individuals who rely on these buses for work, school, and other critical appointments. The suspension, importantly, did not impact AVTA’s local service nor their use of BYD zero-emission battery electric buses, suggesting a specific issue with the MCI D45 models.

At least four critical commuter lines were affected by the suspension, including services to downtown Los Angeles, Century City, the San Fernando Valley and the TRANSporter service to Newhall.
The suspension does not affect AVTA’s local service or the agency’s use of any BYD zero-emission battery electric buses, transport officials said.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/e...ptly-suspended-in-antelope-valley/ar-BB1lluZb
Commuter Chaos and Communication Breakdown
The impact on the community was immediate and severe. Many commuters were left in the lurch, with some only becoming aware of the suspension when handed a flyer while boarding a bus. This last-minute notification is a glaring testament to the lack of effective communication strategies in critical transit service changes. Furthermore, alternative transport options were not seamlessly integrated. Metrolink trains, suggested as an alternative, were reportedly unprepared to accept AVTA passes, leading to confusion and additional expenses for the riders, with one individual’s commute cost tripling as a result of the disruption.

The Underlying Issues
While no official explanation was provided immediately, some speculation pointed towards safety concerns with the electric batteries, such as potential fire risks. This speculation, if true, touches upon a critical aspect of electric vehicle technology — battery safety and reliability. The rapid push for electrification of public transport solutions often glosses over these vital engineering challenges. It is imperative to ask if the technological zeal is overshadowing practical implementation strategies that ensure safety and reliability.

Economic Impact and Policy Shortcomings
The financial ramifications for everyday commuters like the bus rider who reported a threefold increase in daily commuting costs illustrate a broader issue of economic inequity introduced by technological transitions. The shift to electric buses is often touted as a necessary step towards combating climate change, yet the real-time execution of these policies must be scrutinized. Are we advancing towards a future of sustainability at the expense of present-day reliability and economic accessibility?

Moreover, the AVTA’s situation serves as a microcosm of a larger trend where policies and technologies are deployed under the banner of environmental conservation without thorough vetting for practical viability. This incident compels policymakers to reassess the balance between innovation and reliability, especially in essential services like public transportation.

Conclusion
The suspension of the electric bus services in Antelope Valley should act as a wake-up call for transit authorities and policymakers alike. It underscores the necessity of adopting a measured, data-driven approach when integrating new technologies into critical public services. Technology transitions must not compromise on safety, reliability, or economic feasibility. As this case vividly demonstrates, the leap towards futuristic solutions requires not just technological readiness but a robust framework for risk assessment, crisis management, and public communication to truly benefit the communities it aims to serve.

This incident reveals the gaps between the idealistic pursuits of environmental policies and the pragmatic realities of their implementation. It serves as a crucial lesson in the importance of caution and thoroughness in the face of technological or ideological enthusiasm.
 
Dont forget kids, cLIEmate change narrative (manmade climate change) is just another hoax they are trying to sell to you to make you give up whatever liberties you have left! (Such as private car ownership, eating meat, travelling, etc)
 
Dont forget kids, cLIEmate change narrative (manmade climate change) is just another hoax they are trying to sell to you to make you give up whatever liberties you have left! (Such as private car ownership, eating meat, travelling, etc)
Fuck that! I have a 7.3 liter diesel turbo that will live longer than me, and a XXXXXXX to take deer and wild boars with.
 
Could you survive if the grid went out indefinitely? Barring other problems such as criminal stealing, looting, murder and whatever? That will happen later as society collapse.

For now…. Could your present system provide you with the power needed to do without the electric grid in a survival situation vs completely returning and living in 19th century?

I don’t see the internet or cell or most anything working long in that situation so ….. you would not need power for that. Is - was your home built to help with cooling if air conditioner goes…?

You might want to think about these things. If grid goes gasoline will not be able to pump. Small town near me had power outagefor 7-8 hours a while back. Nothing worked everything was down. Could not buy or do anything No food no gas nothing. All stores - restaurants closed. Had drive to another town to get gas. When I was young if power went out it didn’t matter as much….stores had manual cash registers…. Gas was pumped with generators feeding from main tank. Transactions were done in cash.

That town losing power resulted in complete shut down.
 
Could you survive if the grid went out indefinitely? Barring other problems such as criminal stealing, looting, murder and whatever? That will happen later as society collapse.

For now…. Could your present system provide you with the power needed to do without the electric grid in a survival situation vs completely returning and living in 19th century?

I don’t see the internet or cell or most anything working long in that situation so ….. you would not need power for that. Is - was your home built to help with cooling if air conditioner goes…?

You might want to think about these things. If grid goes gasoline will not be able to pump. Small town near me had power outagefor 7-8 hours a while back. Nothing worked everything was down. Could not buy or do anything No food no gas nothing. All stores - restaurants closed. Had drive to another town to get gas. When I was young if power went out it didn’t matter as much….stores had manual cash registers…. Gas was pumped with generators feeding from main tank. Transactions were done in cash.

That town losing power resulted in complete shut down.
The Criminal "stuff" will happen from about day one. They will loose their minds for roughly a month and most of them die off one way or the other. Doubt that look around today with everything working. Most people can't feed themselves for a week. It will come apart quickly, and if they think you have power you will be a target. Positive thing here is when it is this far gone, defending yourself will likely be just fine. Once you and your chosen family and friends, you ain't doing this alone weather that first month things will calm down a bit, with the odd issue here and there.

This is the cold hard truth. It will be very messy as people will loose their minds more then they already have, and you will have things like the ant and the grasshopper.
 
Could you survive if the grid went out indefinitely? Barring other problems such as criminal stealing, looting, murder and whatever? That will happen later as society collapse.

For now…. Could your present system provide you with the power needed to do without the electric grid in a survival situation vs completely returning and living in 19th century?

I don’t see the internet or cell or most anything working long in that situation so ….. you would not need power for that. Is - was your home built to help with cooling if air conditioner goes…?

You might want to think about these things. If grid goes gasoline will not be able to pump. Small town near me had power outagefor 7-8 hours a while back. Nothing worked everything was down. Could not buy or do anything No food no gas nothing. All stores - restaurants closed. Had drive to another town to get gas. When I was young if power went out it didn’t matter as much….stores had manual cash registers…. Gas was pumped with generators feeding from main tank. Transactions were done in cash.

That town losing power resulted in complete shut down.

Solar won't get you through "grid down" IMO.. In that type of situation the least important thing is having electricity. Firewood, Food, Warm Clothes, Ammo etc.

Imagine something like a cracked tooth that's infected and having no one available to extract it.

Those sorts of things.
 
Solar won't get you through "grid down" IMO.. In that type of situation the least important thing is having electricity. Firewood, Food, Warm Clothes, Ammo etc.

Imagine something like a cracked tooth that's infected and having no one available to extract it.

Those sorts of things.

I agree there are more important things, unless you have medical equipment that needs electricity.

But I think the idea was, do you currently have enough solar power to keep the fridge and freezers on for long enough of a time. For me.....I would say just. Here in the spring and fall we can go weeks and never see the sun. That does not do well with solar power. I do have plans to put up an old wind turbine, just because I have it. But that will not do it as well.

If we are still talking about a SHTF type deal you don't want to be running a generator. That is a very loud come here and see what I have and what might be worth taking. Plus about solar is quiet.

Your medical statement goes into why you can't do this alone, you will need trusted help.

This kind of stuff usually falls into the "prepper" side of things. IMHO this is what it is going to be like. Some of you might not have read this.

I hope this link is ok, I don't see much about guns overhere.

 
Back
Top