Yes, I will get a expensive, or possibly UL listed battery to teardown soon. That would be awesome!
Will, please look into different UL standards for batteries and the difference between UL Listed and UL Recognized labels. There are lots of shady statements made by some battery makers when they mention UL. For example, UL1642 deals with individual cells while UL2054 is for small rechargeable battery, like cordless drills, etc. This is not applicable to 100AH+ batteries, where UL1973 is a better choice, but incredibly difficult to achieve. Also, UL has a searchable online database, where you can verify anyone's claims, here it is
https://www.ul.com/apps/product-iq
Basically, any decent battery should have cells tested to UL1642, that would be a starting point.
Some US battery makers boast about UL2054, but it's deceptive because it's meant for small power tool packs, not a large storage battery.
UL1973 is the right standard for energy storage, but very difficult to pass and usually requires battery coupled with inverter for additional safety, or have a BMS with redundant protective devices, which is very expensive for an average customer.
UL Listed means the product is fully safety compliant as is, while UL Recognized means there are some components which have UL certifications, but the product as a whole is not tested to UL standard. For example, if cells inside the battery are UL1642, then a company can claim the battery is UL recognized, but it doesn't mean much if their BMS fails to protect the cells from external abuse, etc.