Only to some degree. I own a small consulting company. In our early days, we produced a fair amount of original content to help educate clients and prospective clients, as did another small company in the industry. All of it was (allegedly) protected by copyright. The owner of that other small firm and I used to stand together in the back of conferences together and count how many of our slides had been ripped off by much larger companies with little real expertise, trying to act like they knew what they were talking about so they could capture consulting business and compete with us in our respective niches. It was almost a competition to see who would get the most content plagiarized. Sure, we could have pursued them legally, but the juice would not have been worth the squeeze, and they had much larger legal budgets. And it was often more fun to just ask them difficult questions in the Q&A, and then watch them squirm. We'd sometimes have a larger line at the end of a talk than the plagiarizing presenter. Good fun...Patents provide protection, so do copyrights. .
A new nation full of clone lovers trying to save a few bucks…what ever happened to pride in ownership? It’s used to be a real thing..SMH….
Only to some degree. I own a small consulting company. In our early days, we produced a fair amount of original content to help educate clients and prospective clients, as did another small company in the industry. All of it was (allegedly) protected by copyright. The owner of that other small firm and I used to stand together in the back of conferences together and count how many of our slides had been ripped off by much larger companies with little real expertise, trying to act like they knew what they were talking about so they could capture consulting business and compete with us in our respective niches. It was almost a competition to see who would get the most content plagiarized. Sure, we could have pursued them legally, but the juice would not have been worth the squeeze, and they had much larger legal budgets. And it was often more fun to just ask them difficult questions in the Q&A, and then watch them squirm. We'd sometimes have a larger line at the end of a talk than the plagiarizing presenter. Good fun...
@BradCagle this guy!
I don't know how you might feel about paying $30 for an Epson, Canon, or HP ink cartridges when an aftermarket ink cartridge for $5 works just as well. Is that pride in ownership or corporate greed? Does ink really cost that much?
The Victron software plus the better parts, Warranty and Support make it worth the extra $60.It does not work with the Victron software. You'd also have to ask yourself if you want to support a company copying/stealing another's work.
Here was review of it:
The Victron software plus the better parts, Warranty and Support make it worth the extra $60.
Oh if only that was the case. I killed a $600 HP color laser printer using cheap Generic cartridges. The dam thing leaked Toner all over the Internals and it would have been a monumental task to strip it to the bone to clean out all of the Toner. If you go on Amazon you will find Aftermarket cartridge horror stories everywhere.I don't know how you might feel about paying $30 for an Epson, Canon, or HP ink cartridges when an aftermarket ink cartridge for $5 works just as well.
I really dont care about it one way or the other ..it doesn’t matter who makes what on such low level stuff …who cares.?I don't know how you might feel about paying $30 for an Epson, Canon, or HP ink cartridges when an aftermarket ink cartridge for $5 works just as well. Is that pride in ownership or corporate greed? Does ink really cost that much?
HP is in trouble for disabling the scanner part of their multi-function printers when the ink is low. So even if you don't print anything and only want to use the scanner part of your multi-function printer, it will refuse to work unless you replace the ink. Associated Press article below.
HP fails to derail claims that it bricks scanners on multifunction printers when ink runs low
HP Inc. has failed to shunt aside claims in a lawsuit that it disables scanners and other functions on its multifunction printers whenever the ink runs low.apnews.com
Pride in ownership, yes, I support that to a certain extent. Corporate greed, hell no!
ditto…?…..I know this won’t be a popular stance to take but personally I want to support people in the world that bring somthing great to the market that I enjoy…they had to work and invent to do it…I want to reward and Thank them….There's design and utility patents and some are longer than others. I doubt Victron has a patent on their shunt.
This is completely different than Intellectual Property which is protected forever, at least in the US. Code used to build devices and software is Intellectual property so cannot be copied any more than someone can rewrite a Harry Potter novel and put their name as the author.
Knock off ink cartridges can be created because printer companies can't patent plastic cartridge to hold ink. Printers used to be sold under the cost to manufacture with the premise you'd buy the ink so they'd recoup and turn a profit. Many printers now have chips on the ink which knockoff companies can't duplicate (IP protected) HP started disabling knock off ink from being allowed and there's a back and forth if it's legal. Knock off ink is made as cheap as possible so many leak and are poor quality which can damage the printers.
Just because it looks like Victron doesn't mean it's anything close to it.
Also I don't know of a single product that Victron sells but doesn't manufacture. Maybe they're fuses or cables. But I'd love to see if anyone knows of them
Amen. The world needs more people with your attitude, approach, and actions.I know this won’t be a popular stance to take but personally I want to support people in the world that bring somthing great to the market that I enjoy…they had to work and invent to do it…I want to reward and Thank them….