I was not able to find any info on this site about these batteries. I only have some cursory knowledge on them, that they heavy, not very energy dense, hard to duplicate BUT have significant longevity. This may be partially or completely wrong.
IMO new batteries are great re: energy density but they are all a recurring source of cost/replacement. Supposedly that isn't so true with Edison batteries.
Thoughts?
IMO new batteries are great re: energy density but they are all a recurring source of cost/replacement. Supposedly that isn't so true with Edison batteries.
Thoughts?