So what do you think happened in Hawaii? I'm going to put you on ignore if you respond with some stupid video link or a link to a website. I want you to say what you think happened.
You think you putting me on ignore somehow scares me? Go right ahead.
I post articles and links for people to read, see, analyze and make up their own mind about. Discussion is always welcome, as long as you can sustain an argument.
So far you did not present any argument other than blatant "if you think Hawaii event is suspicious you are a conspiracy nutcase".
My personal opinion is that the fire was purposefully caused (method is irrelevant, yet you still cling onto this as your sole "argument") so that the usual suspects could scoop all the land for their purposes. Proof of that was already posted (public announcements by govt officials before and after the event).
In your mind proof is just assertions that other people have made. I go by the physical evidence and work backwards. I don't start with a conclusion and then look backwards to jam square pegs into round holes.
I don't need analogies, I need a coherent picture of events of what you think happened. Not a bunch of schizoid thought salad that you made up and doesn't intermesh.
As i said, the video presented some facts and it also discusses all sides of the story. It is obvious you did not watch it. You appear to be one of those people that need not only be led to water, but also made drink for you. Well sorry, you have to use your own head.
Telling me directed energy weapons started the Hawaii fires because the fires burned "real hot" is a dumb thing to say to someone who has seen house fires, cars fires, airplane fires, building fires, land clearing fires firsthand coupled with the fact that I weld and fabricate stuff.
Where did anyone tell you it was "directed energy weapon"? I think you just made this up on the fly. (I noticed that you tend to do that in other threads). In the video they do not say it was a "directed energy weapon".
They simply speculate that usage of some unknow to us tech is a possibility (
https://www.kirtland.af.mil/Portals/52/Air Force Maui Optical and Supercomputing (AMOS) Site_AFMC-2019-0163.pdf) .
This stuff apparently does exist and MIC does not exactly keep a secret.
I dont think anyone made claim that it was that, but hey, who knows? The tech exists, and that is just publicly disclosed one, i would imagine the tech has advanced further since then.
I have no proof that it was that (and again it does not matter, it could have been something as
simple as intentional damage to the powerline via simple mechanical means), but again and again and again - it does not matter. You are stuck on irrelevant detail and you dont see the forest for the trees here.
When you say steal an election you're just making a broad statement. I went into painful detail about how framing that way can be hyperbole (squashing of biden laptop story) or the claims that say dead people voted and machines were changed etc.
Well, a lot of people said it was complete tinfoil hat and many STILL believe it to this day lol. Personally it was obvious to me the night of the election but as i said, to me the whole thing is controlled theater anyways. It just showed that they are doing things in your face now (vs subtly before).
Do you see the difference there or not?
As far as Hawaii, yeah their hands are clean other than they were obviously incompetent in their handling of things and are of course always ready to capitalize on the pile of ashes that's created when they fail. Nothing outlandish there.
Says you. Clearly you have all the evidence. You have personally been to Lahaina during the event, and have full complete awareness of what happened there at the time. In other words 'nothing to see here, move along'
Dont make me laugh. You were probably one of the first people to blame anyone questioning the "wet market" theory.