diy solar

diy solar

Safely using MCB (mini circuit breakers) for PV & Bi-Directional Battery Protection

So these are polarized, and single directional, and are good for solar panels? Just so we can put that to bed.
If wired up correctly they should be fine for solar panels, as the current always flows in the same direction with panels. The guy in the video was saying they were often wired up back to front.

If they are polarized, they can be used as a single disconnect because current only flows from PV positive, through breaker to SCC, back from SCC to PV negative.

(An EE type might say "current flows from negative to positive" but I'll ignore that. Could be more accurate to say electrons flow from negative to positive, and holes flow from positive to negative, but let's ignore facts and semantics.)

If you have three or more PV strings in parallel, do not use a polarize breaker to protect each string. That is because current flows one way in normal operation, but in reverse direction of a PV string is shorted and the other two strings dump current into it.

In that case, fuses or non-polarized breakers should be used. Or, I think, if all poles of all breakers are ganged it will be OK because when one trips it turns off the others which are conducting in forward direction.
 
In that case, fuses or non-polarized breakers should be used. Or, I think, if all poles of all breakers are ganged it will be OK because when one trips it turns off the others which are conducting in forward direction.

I've got rotatory isolators on each string, then a fuse, then the two strings are combined in to parallel, then a non polarised MCB between the combiner and the MPPT. So hopefully I have everything there covered, belts and braces.
 
I dont know of anyone is looking at this as its an old thread. Do u think those small numbers mean something the 1-2, 3-4 I see that in some mcb it is as 1-3, 2-4 I assume the latter is bidirectional. But if someone with more knowledge could tell.
 
I'm not sure on the relevance of the numbers, probably just terminal numbering, but that is not bi-directional going by the diagram.
Do u have an image for bidirectional would be very helpful.
 
That's not a breaker, it's an isolator.
You sure about that???? Why do you think that?

The manufacturer specifically refers to it as an MCB - see the picture below, and specifications attached. It even has a trip curve in the specs. I also use Z Beny's larger moulded case breakers for my batteries.

In my use case its used as an isolator for a fused combiner box, each positive and negative of each string is individually fused. My batteries also have T class fuses, and a breaker. I also have these MCB's between the busbar and MPPT's.

Z Beny is one of the few manufactures that appear to specifically mention no polarity and that they are for PV, hence there is no + or - marked on the diagram.

BB1-63.jpg
 

Attachments

  • DC-circuit-breaker-BB1-63-datasheet-IEC-2021-BENY-New.pdf
    2.7 MB · Views: 9
You're right, I thought it was just an isolator because of the symbol on the front. I didn't realized you had different symbols; here the symbol looks like this:
disj.png

The square and rounded parts indicate it's a thermal-magnetic breaker.

Sorry for the confusion :rolleyes:
 
@BiduleOhm To be honest apart from the switch part of the diagram I've got no idea what the other symbols mean, I just ordered what I considered was appropriate parts going by the manufacturers description, well the second time round anyway.
 
Personally, the question I ask myself is at how many amps the thermal protection will come into operation.

Regarding the MCCB TOMZN I don't even know its trip curve.
Is it B, C or D?
No technical information which is a shame.

Even in the case of curve B we can imagine that a MCCB of 100A will not trigger before perhaps 300A.

Below is an interesting article on the subject.


Edit : TOMZN's answer, "should be" a C curve ?

That said, this does not matter in my opinion, the cables must be sized to support the maximum power of the solar charge controller and the inverter, it could never be greater. The usefulness of this breaker will therefore be to be able to isolate part of the system (I use it for my battery) and above all to interrupt a short circuit which the magnetic part will do instantly. On the other hand, for the thermal part, you will probably never see it trigger in the event of over-current.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top