I think ‘Zero Export to CT’ is pretty clear.
Yes, Zero Export to CT implies that you are grid-tied and outputting energy that is matching phase and frequency with grid (on both L1 and L2).
In addition, ‘Zero Export to CT’ implies you are exporting energy towards the grid but not enough export and power past the CT sensor that is limiting export.
The analogy I find more helpful is that if a DC-coupled array charging a battery through an SCC.
As the battery approaches full charge, the MPPT will throttle-back PV power to exactly match constant-voltage battery charge power.
If additional loads draw more DC energy from the battery, the MPPT will draw more power from the solar panels to supply that additional DC load.
Zero Export to CT is similar except that the approach of consumption where the CT is placed approaching Zero Amps plays the role of a battery approaching full charge state in the DC-coupled analogy and the inverters ability to throttle-back input to avoid Export past the CT sensor plays the role of the MPPT in the DC-coupled analogy.
No, the solar and the charging are not required. What is required is the ability of a DC-powered (battery and/or SCC) inverter to throttle-back grid-tied power generation to avoid export past an external CT sensor clamped to the same leg.
Not understanding how that is relevant, but if you want yo provide a link, I’m happy to have a look…
The Zero Export to CT capability I’m discussing is no different than what any Solark Hybrid inverter can deliver (as well as the Schneider Conext XW Pro).