That was communist sense, i think.
Gold mining in the hills around Gold King was the primary income and economy for the region until 1991, when the last mine closed near Silverton. The Gold King Mine was abandoned in 1923. Prior to the spill, the Upper Animas water basin had already become devoid of fish, because of the adverse environmental impacts of regional mines such as Gold King, when contaminants entered the water system. Other plant and animal species were also adversely affected in the watershed before the Gold King Mine breach.Ummmm it was the EPA who released this wave of water into the Animas. The mine was abandoned in the 1920s .. all those guys are dead and gone.... cant squeeze blood from a dead turnip.
The flippin government causes all sorts of problems here. It was the US government that started the fire that burnt neighborhoods down to the ground in Los Alamos in 2000... and several times after this in other places around here. Morons they are... wait till its spring with 2% humidity and forcast winds of 30 to 50mph and then say light her up boys!
It was the gov that took mine tailings from the Tuerto mine and spread them on the road next to the Pecos river and when spring runoff came it washed heavy metals into the river and then say Dont eat the fish.. theyre full of heavy metals..! Duh!
The very ones YOU expect to help are the ones making the problem exponentially worse.
We dont have a climate change problem.. we have a common sense problem.
My rant
See above.
At the 14:00 mark he starts laying it out. At mark 20:00 he says the truth. Svetz type will have a problem with that video.IMO there is a reason this topic has close to 300 pages, it may be because unlike most
big issues we face "we the people" can play a part in this one, even the most hardiest
sceptic has a roll to play, I would be surprised if you looked on any other forum and
found a basement/chit chat zone with a 300 page Climate Change topic.
each watt of solar we point at the sky is watts the big power supplier's don't need to
generate when enough of us in the world stop sucking on our mother's tits(grid) we
could at least remove coal as fuel option(that would be a big step in the right direction).
when I was a kid each family on our block had a coal bin in the basement, they are all
gone here in the usa now, step in the right direction.
It is not evil for the left to want a clean environment
I never seen them dots connected before.(Especially associated with the whole "EV" push and anything battery), Gain Of Function Research
You sure that was in this thread? I don't recollect any actual scientific proof. You did talk about how propane is fuel dense and you don't like the aesthetics of solar panels, but that's not any sort of proof that climate change is a hoax.I laid out many reasons beyond the recognition of conspiracy.
What specifically do you want to know?... It is also interesting that you didn't include the other failed narratives such as cool down, sea level rise...
Sure they do. There's a little of everything out there....Climate changes, nobody denies that...
That's silly. I've provided links to references to back up my thoughts as to why I believe it is real. You haven't provided any evidence to backup why you think it's fake. You've also said you only believe what you yourself can test/validate, yet you are very sure in your belief that it is a hoax without validation.You are claiming that there is a need to make changes for the sake of that changing climate. The burden of proof is not on my position, but on yours.
History shows us that even natural climate changes cause draught and famine. GHGs are increasing the global temperature, which does change climate.Their plight [child starvation] is not due to humans releasing CO2.
...we have a common sense problem....
Powerful speaker... but ... I wanted to rebut the bit about lithium mining as it's a single side of the coin directed at lithium as if it is much worse than other types of mining:[Have you ever seen a lithium mine?]
The ponds shown in the video are where they're left to dry via sunshine, it's very different from a strip mine or other very destructive mining techniques. Similarly, he talks about the quantity of batteries over the years, but doesn't talk about the recycle capability meaning mining will go down over time. On the turbine blades, those are blades from decades ago and the new ones are designed to be recyclable. Even the old ones can be recycled, but it's cheaper to throw them into a landfill unfortunately. It's not a perfect world, but we can keep chipping away the problems. But don't worry, pretty sure we'll create new ones.So, where does lithium come from? It comes from the Earth, of course, but it doesn't require strip mining or blowing the tops off mountains like other resources do.... most often, lithium is found in briny underground ponds. The liquid is pumped out and left to dry in the sun. ref
IMO there is a reason this topic has close to 300 pages, it may be because unlike most
big issues we face "we the people" can play a part in this one, even the most hardiest
sceptic has a roll to play, I would be surprised if you looked on any other forum and
found a basement/chit chat zone with a 300 page Climate Change topic.
each watt of solar we point at the sky is watts the big power supplier's don't need to
generate when enough of us in the world stop sucking on our mother's tits(grid) we
could at least remove coal as fuel option(that would be a big step in the right direction).
when I was a kid each family on our block had a coal bin in the basement, they are all
gone here in the usa now, step in the right direction.
D71, the video points out the challenges we face, some may see them as roadblocks or
even deal-breakers I see them as opportunities for our young.
The first generation sodium ion are a bit cheaper than LFP but the volumes will not be worldchanging. However, the second generation sodium ion could reach $40 per kWh. Iron LFP batteries could get to $50/kWh with really high volume and efficiency at the cell level.
I never seen them dots connected before.
I hope that line is gaslighting
aenyc, I'm glad it was gaslighting to connect EV/battery tech Gain Of Function Research. thanks!What you dont know about gain of function research?
Ice-age analysis suggests worst-case global warming is less likely
Climate change-driven insurance crisis threatens new US states
The Cooling Dilemma Amid Climate Change
Dhaka launches first-ever Climate Action Plan
Opinion: Carbon Neutral by 2050!
You sure that was in this thread? I don't recollect any actual scientific proof. You did talk about how propane is fuel dense and you don't like the aesthetics of solar panels, but that's not any sort of proof that climate change is a hoax.
What specifically do you want to know?
Sure they do. There's a little of everything out there.
That's silly. I've provided links to references to back up my thoughts as to why I believe it is real. You haven't provided any evidence to backup why you think it's fake. You've also said you only believe what you yourself can test/validate, yet you are very sure in your belief that it is a hoax without validation.
- How we know Climate Change is not a hoax or wrong
- How we know Climate Change is Man-Made
- How The Greenhouse Gas Effect Works (with atmospheric layers)
- How Climate Change Became Politicized
- 200 climate myths With Explanations as to why they're wrong
History shows us that even natural climate changes cause draught and famine. GHGs are increasing the global temperature, which does change climate.
Powerful speaker... but ... I wanted to rebut the bit about lithium mining as it's a single side of the coin directed at lithium as if it is much worse than other types of mining:
The ponds shown in the video are where they're left to dry via sunshine, it's very different from a strip mine or other very destructive mining techniques. Similarly, he talks about the quantity of batteries over the years, but doesn't talk about the recycle capability meaning mining will go down over time. On the turbine blades, those are blades from decades ago and the new ones are designed to be recyclable. Even the old ones can be recycled, but it's cheaper to throw them into a landfill unfortunately. It's not a perfect world, but we can keep chipping away the problems. But don't worry, pretty sure we'll create new ones.
I definitely liked the quote that faith removes doubts and science requires doubt. Is it ironic that doubters of science are the ones that have the most faith their beliefs are correct.
And HOW FLIPPIN STUPID IN BELIEVING THE LIES! Fool me once shame on you.. fool me ten thousand more time shame on me!Amazing how shameless they are in the lying!
D71, I got to believe Darwin's idea of natural selection did not include brain sizeThere are natural orders for a reason It is Nature defining.
The idea of hydrogen may (or may not) be taking off, but hydrogen is not a “source” of energy, it’s an energy carrier. Calling hydrogen an energy “source” is like calling Stormy Daniels an “actress.”The concept of hydrogen as a renewable energy source has been around for years, but only within the past decade has the idea of its potential to replace fossil fuels to power heavy industry taken off, leading to increased investment and advances in the technology. (Emphasis added.)