So you agree, it was a leaking natural gas (not LP higher SG) pipe with a pilot light/igniter ignition source.??Gas appliance with pilot or ignitor. Gas leak in pipe. Room fills with gas from the ceiling down, until it encounters ignition.
i think it was, as a kid i grew up with a lpg gas house furnace, gas water heater, gas dryer, and combination stove/oven. as kids we got the training from my father who was an electrical foreman at the breed power plant.So you agree, it was a leaking natural gas (not LP higher SG) pipe with a pilot light/igniter ignition source.??
Yeah that's what I thought too. But everyone wants to jump on the batteries as the cause. Especially insurance so they can try to get out of paying a claim.To me the battery case looks very much undamaged
https://www.photovoltaikforum.com/thread/214845-explosion-eines-30-kilowattstunden-batteriespeichers-zerstört-wohnhaus-in-wernge/?postID=3444596#post3444596
They don't get out of it.Especially insurance so they can try to get out of paying a claim.
Sure they do. It happens dailyThey don't get out of it.
They don't get out of it.
And then even when they do lose, all they do is put the prices up! Its a no lose gamble.Insurance companies will screw anyone.
Find me a denied insurance claim on a house fire or explosion, it would be worthy of a small news story somewhere. They cover tool battery fires, e-bike fires, all that.
There are other claims like water claims they will fight, but fire claims are like the sacred hazard.
That's a bit different than them trying to deny based on the cause. Finding out you didn't have insurance because it was cancelled or not paid is a separate and possible outcome even in the US. And when I have looked into it before it does seem the UK insurance environment has a lot more leeway for this kind of retroactive nullification. The rare stories I do find in the west are often in the UK.York fire victim, 76, loses insurance payout over form error
Barry Tordoff was told his insurance was void after he 'did not tick a box', his family say.www.bbc.co.uk
No no he was all paid up, it was cancelled after the fact because he failed to declare a previous claimThat's a bit different than them trying to deny based on the cause. Finding out you didn't have insurance because it was cancelled or not paid is a separate and possible outcome. And when I have looked into it before it does seem the UK insurance environment has a lot more leeway for this kind of retroactive nullification. The rare stories I do find in the west are often in the UK.
And when I have looked into it before it does seem the UK insurance environment has a lot more leeway for this kind of retroactive nullification. The rare stories I do find in the west are often in the UK.
Exactly. Always an interesting blend of more consumer protections and yet also less in the UK.
Like on consumer products, you guys theoretically have more legal protections, but everything gets a lot more fighty between the consumers and the retailers. I returned a pack of sausages and some used pans the other day just because I didn't like them, satisfaction guaranteed and whatnot, and they'll look at you like you're crazy if you try that over there.