Tulex
Solar Wizard
I don't think it will happen either, but the point is that's the mindset. It was 10, but Maine pulled out after realizing it wouldn't work.Yep. I'll believe that when I see it. Remember the California ZEV mandate?
I don't think it will happen either, but the point is that's the mindset. It was 10, but Maine pulled out after realizing it wouldn't work.Yep. I'll believe that when I see it. Remember the California ZEV mandate?
No tax credits here.I do find it funny how we all (me too) will purchase something like an EV or a solar system so we can get that tax credit.
Cool story broDiesel pickup trucks were not really a thing in 1978.
Get a used one. And does a person need a v8 pickup just to get groceries? Many v8 vehicles are $80k + anyway.
Picked up a 99 Suburban for around $3k back when gas prices hit $4 a gallons few years back. Tremendous bang for buck.
Problem is who gets to define bad.That was my original point to taxing the bad instead of credits for the good. Easier to balance the budget.
Subject near and dear to my heart. My biggest issue is it seems everything is at the extremes, EV's are either the savior of humanity, or the sorriest trash ever to travel the roadways.A car is worth nothing with no manufacturer. Ask Saab owners how their values held up. Hell my brother pre ordered a Ford Lightning it is the biggest POS on the planet and the Ford dealers won’t even take it on trade towards a diesel F series… It’s worthless…
You do know that the car company Fisker is not related or spelled the same as Fiskars the tool company.
(Aircraft) Turbines are EXTREMELY precise. Amazing but incredibly expensive, and use very esoteric materials. Early versions required teardowns/rebuilds/inspections frequently and constantly.Turbines only have one moving part and my guess is they are more efficient and that is why we see them also being used in power generation. I don't yet see the future of aviation being propelled by electricity but small drones seem to work for short distances.
F-150 PowerBoost Hybrid has a tiny battery that could drive it a few miles, slowly, if you accelerate very gently. But there's no way to plug it in, so it never really "runs on electricity". It keeps the battery near 50% SOC and uses it to help with acceleration and to sit at stop lights and crawl around parking lots without the gas engine idling wastefully. The battery recharges via regenerative braking and, if necessary, running the gas engine a bit harder than needed to generate some surplus electricity. F-150 Hybrid 2WD V6 is rated at 25 mpg vs. 21-22 for the non-hybrid 2WD V6 versions. The Hybrid's V6 is tuned for efficiency more than power, but V6 + e-motor together deliver a bit more total power than the equivalent non-hybrid V6.My brother has an F150 hybrid. Best of both worlds. He can cruise around town on electric, then when it runs low or on long trips run on the ICE.
As of yet, EV's just don't save their owners money except in a handful of short-trip only scenarios where you can always charge from home.
This will always be the case.
I don't understand line 4.buy brand new car
drive it a few days and drive to your buddy's house
go to charge it on your drive back home
get someones 20 year old battery
don't make it home and get stranded in the middle of aussie desert
kangaroo comes and beats you up
not to mention the maintenance nightmare of the machines lifting those batteries constantly
Yep if an EV can achieve 300-500 miles in all conditions (like North Texas where it is 1000 degrees or negative 10) then sign me up.I think EV's are the future, but would agree wholeheartedly that we are not there yet. IMNSHO the aluminum ion battery will be the game changer, might be something else. If they can double the current range and maintain the price points you will start to see a shift. If I can go 500 miles it becomes irrelevant.
There is some loss but I'd hazard a guess, if I had a full charge on my EV and left it for a year, it would still have 90%. I'm not sure how much extreme cold would affect it, assuming you were not driving it, probably not too much with near zero load. I charged my car to 100% and left it for over three weeks once, I hopped in it was showing 99%. Keeping in mind the car is constantly "on" in a standby mode, and will charge the 12v battery from time to time from the traction batteries if it gets low. YMMV.You are saying I can do that? Count me as surprised.
Jet turbines are not very efficient. Aircraft use them because of high power/weight ratios and because they work at higher airspeed than propellers.Turbines only have one moving part and my guess is they are more efficient and that is why we see them also being used in power generation.
Unless you want to build a new house in California.And, solar is apples and oranges. Far as I know, people are opting for solar as a choice. Those that see the benefit go for it, others have no interest. No mandates to turn off my grid by 2030 and have solar only.
There are an awful lot of Tesla's on the road here. In general, at the present time, an EV does not make sense unless you can charge it at home.So why aren't more people buying EV's if they are cheaper overall?
Musk is having financial pain, Tesla is generally fine, though it's profit margins must obviously fall with the prices.Are you sure about that?
I am hearing some Gossip from my old friends in engineering that Musk is having a lot of financial issues.
It would not be surprising considering EV sales have dropped and Starlink/SpaceX is losing money on every Falcon 9 launch with Starlink Satellites.
He is most certainly in the heavy spending phase when it comes to Starlink and he has burned a lot of cash on that Stupid X platform.
Um, Yee -- ess -- ish. Not gonna be able to sell that here or in Europe. Once you get all the safety items in play, ... 30KWH is ~120 miles. So you have a circa 2010 Nissan Leaf for $25KBYD sells their cheapest car (Seagull)in China for $9700. And they make a profit on that.
Seems to have a 30 or 38kWh LFP battery using their blade design
BYD Seagull - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org